US-China Trade Truce: A Strategic Pause or Temporary Relief? - Nik Zafri Analyzes

 

The recent de-escalation of trade tensions between China and the United States, marked by a mutual reduction of tariffs, is a major development in global economics. 

1. HOW

1) Negotiation Rounds: Trade officials from both countries likely engaged in extensive diplomatic talks behind closed doors, exchanging proposals and concessions. 

2) Agreement on Tariff Reductions: A phased reduction in tariffs was probably agreed upon, targeting key sectors (e.g., agriculture, tech, manufacturing). 

3) Public Announcements and Policy Changes: Both governments made coordinated announcements, possibly issuing official decrees or modifying customs schedules. 

4) Monitoring and Review: Mechanisms may be in place to monitor compliance and re-evaluate tariffs in case of disputes or economic shifts.

2. WHY

1) Economic Slowdown Risks: Both economies have felt the strain, higher costs for businesses, inflation, and supply chain disruptions.

2) Global Pressure: The IMF, WTO, and global investors often urge the world’s two largest economies to cooperate for global economic stability.

3) Political Calculations: Leaders may aim to secure domestic support or prepare for elections by easing tensions.

4) Supply Chain Security: Companies and governments want more predictable access to goods and materials.

3. ECONOMY

3.1 Positive

a) Trade Growth: Lower tariffs make goods cheaper, boosting import/export volume between the two countries.

b) Reduced Costs: Businesses save money on raw materials and components, improving margins or reducing prices.

c) Market Confidence: Investors view the easing of tensions as a sign of stability, boosting stock markets.

d) Inflation Control: Lower import costs can ease consumer prices, helping central banks manage inflation.

Global Spillover Effects

e) Revived Global Trade: Other economies benefit from more fluid trade routes and reduced global uncertainty.

f) Currency Stabilization: Less volatility in the yuan and dollar helps stabilize emerging market currencies.

g) Investment Recovery: Global investors may resume or expand investments in both Chinese and U.S. markets.

3.2 Potential Risks

a) Uneven Gains: Some domestic industries (especially those previously protected by tariffs) might face new competition.

b) Geopolitical Complexity: While tariffs ease, tech and military tensions may continue in other forms.

4. ONLY FOR 90 DAYS?

Whether the U.S.- China tariff de-escalation lasts only 90 days or becomes a continual process depends on several key factors:

4.1 If 90 days

a) Allow time for further negotiations.

b) Monitor initial compliance.

c) Defer harsher measures while assessing political and economic reactions.

Such a truce typically includes benchmarks both sides must meet (e.g., increased purchases, IP enforcement, transparency). If either side fails, tariffs could return or escalate.

4.2 If Continual

It will require:

a) A signed trade agreement or treaty with defined terms.

b) Long-term policy alignment on key issues like technology transfer, market access, and subsidies.

c) Mutual political will, especially through leadership transitions or election cycles.

If this current easing is part of a trial period, it's likely to last 90 days, with potential to extend. However, if both parties see strategic benefit, it could evolve into a more stable, ongoing trade relationship.

5. UNCHANGED TARIFFS

Automobiles & Auto Parts, Pharmaceuticals, Aluminum & Steel (Section 232 Tariffs)

These exclusions do still affect the economy, despite overall tariff reductions in other sectors.

5.1 Impact on Other Countries

 5.2 Global Trade Dynamics

• Trade Diversion: Countries not facing tariffs (like Vietnam or Mexico) might see increased demand.
• WTO Role: Allies may press the U.S. at WTO for consistent, rules-based trade policies.
• Investment Hesitancy: Companies may still hesitate to invest if tariffs on key inputs persist.

Even with partial tariff relief, leaving out major sectors like autos, pharmaceuticals, and metals keeps significant economic friction in place. The global response (especially from allies) will depend on whether the U.S. extends tariff relief beyond China or maintains a fragmented approach.

 

5.3 Why Keep Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals, Automobiles, and Aluminum/Steel?

 

Trump argued that leaving these tariffs in place serves one core purpose:

 

To bring manufacturing and strategic industries back to the U.S. 

("If it's made in America, it's better for our jobs, our national security, and our

 independence.")

 

5.4 Can This Be Done Without Hurting the U.S. Economy?

Here’s where economists are divided, because while tariffs protect jobs, they also come with costs. 

Bottom Line - Can it be done without economic impact?

Not entirely. There will always be trade-offs.

But Trump's approach is to accept short-term consumer pain or cost increases in return for long-term gains in industrial capacity, jobs, and strategic autonomy.

It's a "rebuild-from-within" philosophy (protectionist), but aimed at revitalizing U.S. self-sufficiency.

5.5 Global Impact Matrix

6.0 THE 2019 “GOOD DEAL” THAT WENT SOUTH

I believe it's important to revisit the 2019 U.S.- China trade deal, during which both countries were engaged in months of intensive negotiations aimed at resolving ongoing trade tensions

US stated that it was “great deal” reached or was close to being finalized that would:

• Open China's markets further to U.S. companies ("Open China" - which in the recent 2025 deal, China is said still thinking about it)
• Increase Chinese purchases of U.S. goods (esp. agriculture and energy)
• Protect U.S. intellectual property
• End forced technology transfer for American firms
• Include enforceable mechanisms to ensure compliance

In the final stage, US said that China revised key parts of the draft agreement.

They allegedly removed commitments related to enforcement, IP protection, and structural reforms (e.g., subsidies, state-owned enterprises).

Trump called this a “reneging” on a nearly finalized deal and responded by raising tariffs (e.g., from 10% to 25% on $200 billion worth of goods).

6.1 China’s Perspective (2019)

• The U.S. demands were too intrusive, especially demands for changes to sovereign laws.
• They wanted a more balanced deal, with tariff rollbacks included in exchange for concessions.
• The U.S. side, in their view, kept shifting goalposts.

China was reportedly even during that time - willing to buy more U.S. goods, but resisted deeper structural reforms, especially changing domestic laws and accepting unilateral U.S. enforcement mechanisms

And with tariffs on key sectors staying in place, China may think:

“Why make deeper concessions when the U.S. won’t even roll back current tariffs?”

 

6.2. Unchanged Tariff?

I think the unchanged U.S. tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and aluminum/steel very likely played a contributing role in China’s alleged last-minute withdrawal from the trade deal. This was based on 2019 history:

During the trade negotiations, China expected that any deal would include:

• Phased tariff rollbacks, not just a halt on new tariffs
• Removal or easing of existing tariffs, especially those imposed under:
• Section 301 (general goods from China)
• Section 232 (steel and aluminum, affecting many nations including China)

But Trump’s position at the time was:

• Keep key tariffs intact as leverage
• Use compliance enforcement over time to maybe reduce tariffs later
• Exclude items like automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and metals from immediate relief

This mismatch in expectations led to a breakdown.

The excluded tariffs were on strategically sensitive on China’s side

If these tariffs remained, China may feel that the deal lacked good faith or reciprocity.

While not the only reason, the unchanged tariffs on autos, pharma, and metals were a significant sticking point that contributed to the collapse of the draft deal. China likely saw little benefit in making deeper concessions when key U.S. tariffs remained untouched, especially on sectors core to its national interests.

7.0 DID PRESIDENT TRUMP REVISITED THE KEY ELEMENTS OF 2019 US-CHINA TRADE DEAL?

The answer is almost a big “YES”. President Donald Trump is revisiting key elements of the 2019 U.S.- China trade deal especially the parts he considers strong negotiating wins as a template or leverage point for his 2025 trade stance, particularly as he prepares for a possible return to office. Here’s how :

 

Possible Risks in 2025 if President Trump Returns with 2019 Playbook

8.0  HOW GLOBAL STOCK MARKET REACT 2025 (I BELIEVE IT’S A MIRROR OF 2019)

General Market Reaction to the 2025 U.S. - China Trade Deal (Based on What I Unqualifyingly Analyze)

a. Initial Optimism

Global indices did rally on news of a truce or deal - markets often welcome de-escalation in trade tensions.

However, I’m unsure how positive did the investors respond on the recent truce:

• Did it really ease tariff threats?
• Did it really restore global supply chains?
• Did it really renew business confidence?

 Sectors That Benefit :

• Tech stocks (Apple, Nvidia, Samsung) - less risk from tariffs or component supply disruptions
• Industrial/export-heavy firms (Caterpillar, Boeing) - reliant on global trade
• Emerging markets - especially those linked to supply chains or raw materials

b. Cautious Optimism or Flatlining After Details Emerge

The deal might still lack clarity or enforceability, and I see the markets started to show sign of cooling off.

Tariffs that remain (e.g., on automobiles, pharmaceuticals, or metals) have somehow limit long-term investor enthusiasm.

Personally, the investors and I feel that the deal being more symbolic than structural.

c. Volatility Based on Political Rhetoric

Markets may react sharply to statements by US or Chinese officials, especially if:

• Talks break down again
• There’s backlash from Congress, WTO, or domestic industries
• Enforcement mechanisms are weak

Thus :

The 2025 deal mirrors earlier ones like in 2019, the market may be seeing:

• A short-term bounce
• Followed by sector-specific adjustments
• Then we’ll be seeing cautious trading until implementation details are confirmed

WHAT I REALLY THINK

What I feel (don’t quote me), the deal did happened but :

Temporary Stabilization, Not a Resolution

The agreement represents a short-term de-escalation rather than a long-term solution. Structural issues in U.S.-China economic relations remain unresolved, and both sides appear to be buying time rather than genuinely reconciling key differences.

Strategic Motivations Behind the Truce

The U.S. agreed to postpone additional tariffs to reduce pressure on domestic markets and consumers, especially ahead of elections, while China aimed to ease the economic slowdown and regain investor confidence.

Global Economic Reactions Are Cautiously Optimistic

While markets initially reacted positively, uncertainty lingers as no clear roadmap exists for addressing deep-rooted issues such as intellectual property theft, state subsidies, and technology transfer demands.

Underlying Rivalry Persists

The truce does not mark the end of U.S.-China strategic competition. Rather, it shows a tactical pause amid broader geopolitical rivalry spanning trade, technology, and global influence.

Long-Term Outlook Remains Volatile

Without meaningful and enforceable commitments, the risk of trade tensions resurfacing remains high. Future negotiations will test the political will and strategic priorities of both nations.

GAP ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT ON THE DUE DILIGENCE AND AUDIT REPORT - ASSESSOR : NIK ZAFRI

This is a rare opportunity to share key insights from QHSEL Consultancy Sdn. Bhd. confidential gap analysis and assessment of a due diligence and audit report carried out for a construction group with interests in quarry operations. Declassified with the client’s explicit consent for educational references. The content also offers viewers a clearer understanding of the scope and depth of my professional work particularly as it represents one of many confidential assignments not typically included in my biodata or CV.

Forgiveness: When Families Say No, How Do Individuals Move On? Overview by Nik Zafri

 

This article has been reviewed by mental health experts (preferred anonymous)

Facing family rejection, especially after going through life-altering experiences like incarceration, addiction recovery, or running away can be deeply painful. It touches on identity, belonging, and the core human need for connection. What should be done?

Take Responsibility Without Self-Punishment

If you’ve hurt loved ones in the past, own it. But don’t punish yourself forever. Make amends if possible, not to erase guilt, but to show growth.

Here are some structured recovery programs originally created by Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and later adapted for various addictions and behavioural issues (e.g., Narcotics Anonymous, Al-Anon for families, etc.)

Core Principles:

• Admit powerlessness over the addiction or behaviour,
• Acknowledge a higher power (not necessarily becoming too religious),
• Build moral inventory of yourself,
• Make amends to those you’ve hurt despite you've been rejected - if not learn to forgive yourself and move on,
• Continue self-assessment, prayer, or meditation, and
• Support others in recovery as part of your own healing.

It promotes accountability, humility, forgiveness, and community support essential for rebuilding trust with others and yourself.

Restorative justice is a rehabilitative approach to justice that focuses on repairing harm rather than punishing offenders. It's often used in schools, communities, and even the criminal justice system.

Key Elements: The offender, victim, and sometimes the community come together in a facilitated dialogue.

The offender takes responsibility for their actions.

The goal is to understand the harm, allow the victim to express feelings, and collaboratively find ways to make amends.

It allows for healing through acknowledgment, often leading to deeper emotional closure for both parties, something conventional punishment often doesn't offer.

Both systems emphasize:

• Personal responsibility,
• Emotional healing, and
• Rebuilding relationships through honesty, empathy, and action.

Conclusion

Healing doesn’t always mean reconnection. Sometimes it means accepting the door is closed and choosing to build a life full of people who see your worth now, not who you were then.

Case Study : Malaysia

Note : Stats have been extracted from many sources and search engines

In Malaysia, the reintegration of former prisoners is notably supported by their families, contributing significantly to their successful reentry into society.

A study involving 240 parolees revealed that a substantial portion received strong family support:

• 87.1% relied on family members for accommodation upon release,
• 59.2% reported frequent family visits during incarceration,
• 50.0% indicated that family members assisted in securing employment post-release. 

Additionally, another study found that 54.6% of parolees received moderate family support, 37.5% experienced high support, and only 7.9% reported low support. 

Malaysia's reintegration programs have demonstrated impressive outcomes:

• 99.76% success rate in community reintegration, with a recidivism rate of just 0.24% among former inmates,
• Community-based rehabilitation is 73.3 times more effective than facility-based rehabilitation in preventing recidivism. 

Despite strong familial backing, some former prisoners face difficulties:

Stigma and Discrimination: Former prisoners may encounter societal prejudice, affecting their reintegration, 

Mental Health Issues: Conditions like addiction or trauma can impede the reintegration process.

Employment Barriers: Criminal records can limit job opportunities, leading some to work in the informal sector, where exploitation is more common. 

These factors underscore the need for comprehensive support systems, including mental health services and employment assistance, to facilitate successful reintegration.

In summary, while family support plays a pivotal role in the reintegration of former prisoners in Malaysia, addressing societal stigma, mental health challenges, and employment barriers is crucial for ensuring their successful reentry into society.

Thriving Through Organizational Change: Bridging Seasoned and Young Professionals - by Nik Zafri

 

“Change is the only constant” 

a phrase often repeated, rarely understood in its full weight until it lands on your desk, your workflow, or your job description. 

Organizational change whether driven by digital transformation, leadership shifts, restructuring, or market realignment is no longer a once-in-a-decade event. It is ongoing, accelerating, and multi-generational.

In my experience conducting motivation-based courses, I’m consistently asked the following two questions :

• How do professionals, young and seasoned alike, not just survive but thrive through change? 

• How can senior professionals remain relevant and respected even when reporting to younger bosses?

These are hard questions for me but I'll try to delve with case studies, research-backed insights, and actionable strategies for everyone in today’s evolving workforce.

1.0 The Reality: Change Is Disruptive (and Expensive)

According to McKinsey & Company , nearly 70% of organizational transformation efforts fail, largely due to :

• employee resistance, 
• lack of engagement, or 
• unclear communication. 

Yet when executed well, organizations that embrace structured change see productivity increase by up to 25% and employee satisfaction rise by 20–30%.

Meanwhile, a 2023 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends survey found that:

61% of professionals felt overwhelmed by constant change,

48% feared being left behind due to digital transformation,

But 71% were willing to reskill or shift roles if given clarity and support.

Case Study 1: Siemens From Traditional Engineering to Digital Twin Leadership

Case Study 2: Unilever – Flattening Hierarchies and Empowering Young Leaders

2.0 How Can Young Professionals Adapt?

a. Stay Curious, Not Complacent

Ask questions, not just for knowledge but to learn from others' experience. Show humility when working with seniors, it earns trust and opens doors.

b. Get Comfortable with Ambiguity

Change is rarely clear-cut. Embrace iterative work and unstructured problem-solving.

c. Build Tech and People Skills Together

Digital skills are essential, but so is empathy, communication, and cross-generational respect.

3.0 How Can Seasoned Professionals Adapt?

4.0 What Happens When the Boss is Younger?

Let’s be honest, it’s awkward at first for both sides. 

BUT RESPECT IS EARNED, NOT DICTATED BY AGE

“In my mid-50s, I found myself reporting to a 32-year-old CMO. At first, I felt invisible. But once I started mentoring his team on stakeholder management and client psychology, skills AI can't teach he told me I was his most trusted partner.” - Former Global VP, now Leadership Coach

4.0 Conclusion

For All Professionals (Regardless of Age)

• Learn continuously. There are many platforms on the internet,
• Strengthen emotional intelligence. That’s what holds people together during turbulent change.
• Communicate transparently. Ask, share, clarify, silence kills culture.
• Adapt your role to value delivery, not title.
• Ask yourself - “How do I help the team win?” will beat “What’s in my job description?”

Change is no longer something to "get through." It's the new normal.

Whether you're a young professional fresh out of university, or a seasoned expert with 30 years under your belt, the real winners are those who:

• Stay flexible in their role,
• Stay humble in their approach,
• And stay human in how they work with others.

Because in a world where AI is doing more, it’s the human capacity to adapt, relate, and guide that becomes most valuable.

AI vs. Human: Redefining Work, Not Replacing It - A Wake-Up Call for Every Generation - By Nik Zafri

 

With how fast AI and robotics are moving, it's no surprise that a lot of people are worried especially about the risk of losing their jobs someday. Well, I don’t blame them. I feel that the need to study the current situation is very important by looking at the right data.

The adoption of AI and robotics no doubt IS making many operations faster, cheaper, and more efficient but it is also reshaping (not just reducing) human employment, not eliminating it entirely. Let’s break it down, shall we?

WHERE HUMAN STILL FITS IN

Employment isn't disappearing, it's evolving

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY EXAMPLES

Since 2017, Ford Motor Company has heavily automated its factories with robotic arms and AI, reducing 12% of line worker jobs. But Ford also hired 8% more engineers, software developers, and robot maintenance specialists.

While Tesla Motors Ltd uses 10,000+ robots at its Gigafactories, it still employs 127,000 humans globally (as of 2024), growing by 15% year-on-year because human design, supervision, creative problem-solving, and innovation can't be fully automated.

SKILLS OF THE FUTURE??

Old World = Humans = manual, repetitive, predictable jobs.

New World = Humans = creative, strategic, empathetic, supervisory, and technical roles.

Machines = repetitive, dangerous, analytical, precision roles.

AI and robotics will cause a reduction in traditional jobs. However, they will create new jobs requiring higher cognitive skills, technical expertise, and creativity. Employment doesn't vanish, it migrates.

AI/ROBOTICS MIGRATION TO HIGHER-SKILLED JOBS

When AI and robots take over basic or repetitive work, humans are pushed "up the value chain" into roles that need more thinking, judgment, and creativity.

Example: Amazon is automating warehouse picking, but it hires more robot maintenance staff, AI logistics optimizers, and human warehouse flow planners now.

IMPACT ON TRADITIONAL MANAGEMENT POSITION

AI and automation are also changing; not removing; traditional management jobs.

Administration, Finance, HR, Legal, even Management are not dying but evolving into strategy, design, interpretation, and leadership based on insights provided by AI.

Humans are still needed at "the judgment level" and to navigate emotions, uncertainty, and innovation, where machines are still weak..

OTHER SECTORS

STILL ON ARCHITECTURE (VR, AR, MR) 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-future-architectural-arvrmr-nik-zafri-bin-abdul-majid/

Architecture is becoming one of the most exciting "human-tech fusion" fields. The combination of VR (Virtual Reality), AR (Augmented Reality), MR (Mixed Reality), and AI (Artificial Intelligence) is revolutionizing design, collaboration, and client experience.

REAL-WORLD CASES

 1. AI-Generated Designs + VR Review

Tools like Spacemaker (now Autodesk Forma) use AI to create multiple design options (sunlight, wind, density).

Designers then use VR to walk through those spaces before a single brick is laid.

2. AR Site Integration

Imagine holding an iPad on-site and seeing the future building overlaid on the empty land.

AI integrates building data with real-time environment, helping contractors plan sequences, identify clashes.

3. MR for Client Collaboration

Client wears a headset (like Microsoft HoloLens), walks through a partially constructed home.

Interact with the design - change kitchen layout, try wall textures.

AI adapts the design instantly based on choices, and updates BIM (Building Information Modeling) in the background.

SO WHAT?

Architects will need to be:

• Fluent in tools like Twinmotion, Enscape, Unreal Engine, Unity (for VR/AR)
• Able to guide AI-assisted design tools
• Great storytellers, turning data and 3D models into client-friendly experiences.

THE FUTURE (5-10 YEARS?)

Clients won’t review 2D plans anymore, they’ll expect immersive, interactive design presentations.

AI will co-design with you, and immersive tech will be the bridge between your vision and the client’s understanding.

Construction coordination (with engineers, MEP, contractors) will happen in shared MR environments, not long WhatsApp threads.

 

PROBLEM 1 –  EDUCATION

The education system and government policies maybe outdated compared to technology growth.

Universities and colleges are still teaching for the Industrial Age, but we are living in the AI Age.

• Graduates are learning theories, but companies now want:
• Technical agility (basic coding, data handling)
• Digital literacy (use AI tools, not build them necessarily)
• Adaptability and self-learning skills.

Result:

• Many graduates can't get jobs.
• Many available jobs require skills they weren’t taught.

Overall human employment will be lower in many traditional fields because AI and robotics automate faster than humans can retrain.

HOW TO FIX THIS?

Learn practical digital skills NOW 

• Self-learning using free/cheap online platforms  - (eg. Coursera , EdX , LinkedIn for Learning , even YouTube )
• Basic AI use (not building, but operating tools)
• Data basics (Excel, Python , Power BI )
• Communication, emotional intelligence.

Develop a side skill or freelance capability

Graphic design, coding, digital marketing, copywriting - platforms like Fiverr, Upwork are growing

Don't rely too much on your qualifications but rather build a portfolio - show proof of what you can do, not just what you studied.

PROBLEM 2 - SEASONED PROFESSIONALS (FROM MID AGE AND ABOVE)

TO BE FAIR - WAKE UP PEOPLE

• Those who don't adapt will fall behind faster than at any time in modern history.

• Waiting for "the system" to fix itself is risky.

• Individuals, families, communities must push for re-skilling urgently otherwise, inequality will explode.

HOW GREEN INITIATIVES LIKE RECYCLING, INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS, WASTE RECOVERY AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE AND GLOBAL WARMING

 An overview by Nik Zafri

Sustainability has always been close to my heart. Over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to evaluate many green initiatives led by corporations, and it fills me with hope to see real progress taking shape. I believe every industry has a role to play, and I encourage all sectors to rise to the challenges for the sake of our planet, our children, and the future we all share.

Green initiatives should come not just from fear of laws and penalties, but from a genuine love for our planet and the hope of leaving behind a cleaner, better world for the next generation. When we act from the heart, the impact is deeper and more lasting.

1.0 RECYCLING

a. Recycling - saves raw materials and energy. For example, recycling aluminum saves up to 95% of the energy needed to produce new aluminum from ore.

b. Reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with mining, refining, manufacturing, and waste decomposition in landfills (landfills emit methane, a potent GHG).

2.0 INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS

One company's waste becomes another company's raw material.

a. Reduces the overall resource extraction, manufacturing emissions, and waste disposal.

Example: Excess steam from one factory used to power another can cut both CO₂ emissions and fossil fuel use.

b. Landfill usage - reduces landfill volumes (landfills = methane) and prevents open burning, which releases CO₂ and other pollutants.

3.0 ENERGY RECOVERY

Recovering energy (like biogas from organic waste) or materials (like scrap metals) means less dependence on extracting virgin resources.

Seeking ways to generate alternative energy sources (solar, wind, hydro, bioenergy) will drastically cut reliance on fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas.

Renewable sources emit little to no direct GHGs during operation, hence mitigating the root cause of global warming.

4.0 SUMMARY 

These initiatives cut carbon emissions, limit pollution, and prevent further resource depletion, all of which directly slow down the pace of climate change and global warming.

5.0 HOW GREEN INITIATIVES CONTRIBUTE TO ESG 

(Environmental, Social and Governance)

5.1 Environmental (E)

a. Direct impact - conserving resources, reducing emissions, and promoting biodiversity.

b. Companies adopting these initiatives show proactive management of environmental risks.

Social (S)

a. Creates green jobs (e.g., recycling centers, renewable energy technicians).

b. Improves community health by reducing pollution and waste.

c. Promotes energy access, especially in rural areas (e.g., off-grid solar).

Governance (G)

Many clients asked the same question, my answer is the same : 

a. It indicates leadership and ethical responsibility in decision-making.

b. It demonstrates compliance with environmental laws and international sustainability standards thus helping the implementation of EMS ISO 14000, LEEDS, GBI, Energy Audit etc.

c. It builds trust among investors, customers, and regulators, because the company is seen as managing long-term risks smartly.

Bottom line -  Green initiatives = fighting climate change + strengthening ESG credibility, leading to a win-win for the planet and for sustainable business growth.

CONCLUSION (For now)

True commitment to green initiatives must transcend fear of regulatory action. It should be rooted in a sincere respect for the environment and a conscious effort to build a sustainable legacy for those who come after us. Sustainability driven by values, not fear, creates real and lasting change.